There has been widespread media coverage of the Environment Secretary’s announcement that he will bring forward proposals to raise the civil penalty for water companies who pollute the environment by 1,000-fold - from £250,000 to up to £250 million.
The proposal – covered by The Telegraph, Daily Express, Times, Daily Mail, Evening Standard, Daily Mirror, Independent and ITV News - comes as part of the government’s ongoing action to push for water companies to invest more in infrastructure that will minimise pollution incidents and secure our water supply for future generations.
Whilst fines handed out by the courts to water companies through criminal prosecutions are unlimited, these can be a lengthy and costly process. Using civil sanctions – Variable Monetary Penalties (VMPs) – which can be imposed directly by the EA can offer a quicker method of enforcement.
The current limit for VMPs handed out by the EA for individual breaches of the rules is £250,000. Increasing the cap for fines up to £250 million will simplify and speed up the process of enforcement by allowing the EA to directly hand out penalties to water companies.
Last month the Environment Secretary asked water companies to write to him, setting out their plans for improving environmental performance and infrastructure. Responses have been received from all water companies and are currently being scrutinised as part of the ongoing work by the government, the Environment Agency and the regulator Ofwat to drive up water companies’ performance and increase accountability.
Environment Secretary Ranil Jayawardena said:
I have been clear that if water companies don’t do what is expected, there will be consequences. Bigger financial penalties will act as a greater deterrent and push water companies to do more, and faster, when it comes to investing in infrastructure and improving the quality of our water.
This 1,000-fold increase sends a clear signal that we want clean rivers and coastlines, and that the duty falls to the water companies to deliver – the polluter must pay.
Environment Agency Chief Executive Sir James Bevan said:
Since 2015 the Environment Agency’s criminal prosecutions against water companies have secured fines of over £138 million – with a record £90 million fine handed out to Southern Water for corporate environmental crime.
However, criminal prosecutions can be lengthy and costly, so we welcome today’s proposals which will make it easier for us to hold water companies to account for environmental crimes.
We will now work closely with government to put this plan into action.
Today’s proposal will be subject to consultation.
Comment by Ashley Smith posted on
'Today’s proposal will be subject to consultation.' With whom - the water companies?
If that is used to make a noticeable reductions in illegal pollution I will eat my hat.
Comment by William Hughes-Games posted on
You don't explain what sorts of pollution water companies cause.
Comment by John W. Baxter posted on
Wow!.......what a long overdue statement that gives the EA the ability to get stuck into water companies who have abused their duties in the past, whether with EA cronies in the companies or in the EA.
Instead of blaming farmers for so much pollution the focus will now turn to the biggest polluters building more waste water retention capacity to hold waste water in larger volumes to be treated with better treatment capacity, and no longer using the victorian infrastructure excuse for overloaded systems dependent on Csos.
This is very good news for those who care for their surroundings.
Comment by Tony Johnson posted on
We have had sewage problems for several years, because the sewage drain is ancient (at least 100yrs) and over the years the drain has had a school grow from 500 to over 2000 pupils along with another small school. The drain blows manhole covers and sewage flows down the avenue. United Utilities (UU) turn out to jet the drains, and cut out invasive tree roots in the pipes. The local Bolton Council have to continually turn out to sweep debris and clean out the roadside gullies as flood water comes off the UU catchment and flood the avenue and rip up the roads and adds to the sewage drain. This is a serious local problem but no doubt widespread with the water companies not taking their responsibilities seriously and these fines don't seem to get them to address these problems. This is a bigger issue than rivers and coast and shows under funding of their ancient infrastructure.